Sunday, March 18, 2012

The C in D.C: Project X & The Race Between The Unknowns


Luckily, DC has yet to be plagued with another year of Snowmageden or Snowpocolypse, so I’ve been much more interested in being out and about, rather than in and on the couch with my sparse free time. What that means is my weeks of regimented movie catching up has been foiled and I am, once again, behind on what’s at Red Box. Or on Netflix. Or even what came out at all during the fall and spring semester.

Since college encompasses all of my time – and money – the movie theaters and I are like an estranged married couple; we both want to see each other but can never put the time or money in to quite make it happen. And, as it turns out, I like to take advantage of our half-hearted situation and movie hop from blockbuster to blockbuster. No wonder we don't last too long. 

On a recent whim, a friend and I decided to splurge for a 2-for-1 movie: 2 movies, 1 ticket. Our intentions were to see the new action-packed Denzel Washington movie, Safe House. But after realizing we’d be over half an hour late, we decided to concede to anything else that happened to be playing at 11:30pm on a Friday. One can imagine choices were slim.

Enter stage right, Project X. What was described as a ‘pretty cool party movie’ turned out to actually be one of the most blatantly outlandish, racist, stereotypical fantasies I've ever seen - concocted from the mind of a 15-year old boy Im sure - than an actual movie. Nudity, drugs, subordination, destruction, mayhem and a mob mentality similar to “I Want To Rock & Roll All Night”, only enacted by horny suburban teens and surprisingly mastermind by 3 awkward boys. The whole movie was just nonsense after nonsense, plot or basic movie planning be damned, and instead injected with hormones, bad ideas and enough randoms to actually do all those bad ideas. Oh yes and alcohol - the driving factor toward everyones release of any inhibitions they felt moral pressure to stifle. 

All in all - I was not the least bit impressed and having not even paid for my admission into the theater, I still expected some refund of money. Or time. Or simply the trillion or so brain cells I had undoubtedly lost in those 2 hours. 

I found it especially odd that, only a day or so later, the talk of every virtual town was Project X. It was trending on Twitter, both as a promoted topic and one voluntarily talked about, all around the country. It was hyped up and discussed on Facebook. And I even received a verbal bantering when a friend informed me his friends (two sets of friends removed - let's keep that in mind) had actually worked on the film, and how impressive it and the soundtrack both were for a mere 12 million dollars. How dare I. 

12 million lost, in my opinion. It doesn't take 12 million to capture volatile teen spirit. 

On the complete other hand, Red Tails, a relevant movie about the historical and irrefutably iconic Tuskegee Airmen during World War II, had noteble issues getting made. Even with a war theme. With an all-star cast. With an accomplished producer like George Lucas. 

Why? Because the cast was all-Black. Because there were no major roles for Caucasians. Because the entire film celebrates Black accomplishments in history and against adversity. Really, how many films have been made that encompass all three of these aspects? 

George Lucas, being an avid supporter of colorful movie magic, has ignored the barriers imposed upon his creativity and vision since Star Wars of the 70's and Billie Dee Williams. (Pause to swoon).

Still, even stamping his name on Red Tails did not automatically convince the studios. So - like a boss - Lucasfilms footed the bill to produce the film. And yes, it cost quite a bit more than 12 million like Project X. 

Which is what brings me to my actual full encompassing observation: Movies like Project X, as 'cheap' and invaluable as they are to the world of movies, are still being made and someone is ultimately footing the bill and making major dough. There were no writers, the set was some random Pleasantville-esque neighborhood and 90% of the actors were extras. Yet an actual movie, that has all those lacking factors and then some, has trouble being made even when backed by a legendary movie producer and a qualified cast?

Its less of a matter of which movie was actually better (hello - they are completely opposite & appeal to different audiences) but more so which movies are getting made, why, and why aren't others?

What if Lucasfilms had not stepped up to the plate to pay? A movie like Red Tails would never have been made? 
How many other un-Lucas-afied films are about to be trashed without the money to make them?

Least we remember these aren't just 2 movies. One is a predominantly White film, while the other is mostly Black. Interestingly enough, Red Tails actually had more White people in it, even being set in 1940's Europe and being about the Tuskegee Airmen, than Project X had Black people, placed at a party in the US 2012. 

Does that seem odd to anyone else?

I believe the media reflects back onto its public what they want to see. What they want to believe and what they are comfortable accepting as a mirrored reality. Movies are simply a facade of that multi-dimensional projection. Does this mean we, as a society encompassed of countless ethnicities and cultures, want more of the racism and stereotypical personas we seemingly try to eradicate? Are we perpetuating our own discomforts and prejudices to ourselves and even the youth? Or are we simply too caught up in the mind warp that is 'Caucasian is better' and can't seem to convince ourselves otherwise, even when compared to something more inclusive and actual? I project an image that is certainly not being mirrored back to me, on any level, in any medium of the media. 

Im unsure what it is exactly. But more than ever I can actually see past the hype and the smoked mirrors to the media machine behind it all. And it's trying to feed me more of the same colorless bullshit as ever before.

Enough. Im full. 


5 comments:

cheeriocheeks said...

Hey honey buns :) I think you make some very relevant and insightful points. I agree wholeheartedly that there is a problem with the media--more specifically the stereotypes it perpetuates. I've taken a 'see it for what it is' approach and can enjoy movies like Project X simply for the shock value. I am no longer surprised at seeing these types of absurdities and simply find it amusing. But, of course, this does just feed into the system. Brings up an interesting question. How can you really expect these things to change in the mainstream when their messages are so pervasive and powerful? I will continue to analyze all I want, support projects that express the truth/encourage diversity and openness, and hope that awareness will continue to reach the ignorant :) Until then, I'll just laugh at the stupidity and go on about my business. lol

KP said...

You make some pretty compelling points, most of which are all very true, but i think that you're reading too much into it. Mass media, which creates movies like project X and superbad, etc., are intended to entertain and to create a shock-n-awe story line that requires very little critical thinking or analysis. Viewers enjoy these movies because it requires 0 thinking on their part, they can just sit back, relax, and enjoy the movie for what it is - 2 hours of entertainment. Red Tails, on the other hand, is cinematic art which requires reflection, critical thinking and empathy as you're supposed to put yourself in the airmens' shoes, etc. the reason movies like project x get made more frequently than movies like red tails is because the MASSES prefer mass media type entertainment, they're cheaper to make and therefore turn more profit. it takes artists like george lucas and steven spielberg to make art, and most of the people in the business aren't into making art anymore, they're into making money. i see it as less of a race issue than it is a money/masses issue. when it comes to being recognized as art, however, the academy is still never going to award project x or superbad anything, and red tails will always be seen as a superior movie for years to come. project x will be forgotten in 8 months.

akklaim83 said...

You did it again! I've seen both movies and I wasn't really wowed by either. Watching red tails made me feel like the movie was made simply to pander to black peoples since of pride and need to like "all things black"....project x on the other hand was a unrealistic teenaged soft core porno that left me feeling some what dumber after I left the theater....I think the hbo special "the Tuskegee airman" was a much much better film by far! I really enjoy your commentary though.

KP said...

you always have to consider the perspective i'm coming from, too, though. being white, i'm probably less inclined to see things as a race issue. but i do agree that african americans, and other minorities, are frequently stereotyped or tracted into roles that perpetuate negativities; the same can be said about women, why must they always be the loveless/virginal heroine or the evil temptress? the fact of the matter is that movies tell a story, and the stories reflect our times. trying to figure out if it perpetuates it or just reflects it is like trying to figure out if the chicken or the egg came first (though i'm inclined to say chicken). I, for one, enjoy thought-provoking movies and love historical dramas...but i'm not above watching debauchery take place for 2 hours and just laughing at the absurdity. :)

Anonymous said...

I thought it was a good read. Honestly, I hadn't even thought of the racial aspect. I'm not gonna argue that it wasn't there, there is definitely a level of underlying, if not overt, racism to this. It's just that with Red Tails being so severely under-promoted and already out of theaters, I had just never really thought about it to make the comparison. My main problem (up until you pointed out the racism to me) was that such an unarguably shitty movie can receive so much hype that people will actually start to believe that it's good just because it got so much attention. This movie was marketed as a comedy, but I cannot recall laughing one time throughout the whole film. The party itself was pretty ordinary up until the point that it became ridiculous to the point of implausibility (a guy with a flame thrower? really?), so there wasn't much entertainment value there. And let's not forget that this is supposed to be a high school party, so while the actresses are all obviously legal, we're supposed to believe they're all high school aged. So we're watching high school aged girls get naked at a party (though I guess Project X is no guiltier of this then say franchises such as American Pie). But ultimately this comes down to Project X was a really, really, really poorly put together film. The characters are either unlikable (Costa, that douchebag college sports star) or unrelatable (pretty much everyone else). And the writing/execution was terrible. There was nothing redeemable in that movie. Like you said, it was pure juvenile fantasy. It was obvious where the film was trying to be a direct copy of Superbad and The Hangover, without the benefit of clever writing or legitimate shock value (which I do feel has some merit, if executed properly). This was just a bastardization of both those films. I would say that Costa is the epitome of what this film represents - something that tries way too hard to be cool, and fails miserably, entertaining only those too immature to know that they should really be annoyed by it.